ETLJB 05 January 2013 [Updated 08 January 2012] Guest Poster: Matthew Libbis BA (Hons), Anthropology* - Along the southern coast of central East Timor is a hamlet whose
ancestral home is in the hills, which is where they say they are from, no
matter where they live, or were born.
The hamlet was there at the time of the Second World War,
and people fled to their homelands in the hills, where most of the villagers
still lived, to escape the Japanese, who were sending in fighter aircraft to
strafe the Australian soldiers based near the hamlet.[i]
People returned to the hamlet after the war, but again fled
when Indonesia invaded. Indonesia moved the entire Tetun village down from the hills,
to prevent them assisting the resistance, and settled them along the coast.
People from the hamlet that was there during WWII again fled the militia in
1999; however, the more recent arrivals from the village stayed on their new
lands.
Indonesia first moved the population onto lands that had a
pre-existing Mambai population. The resultant conflicts between the groups over
land claims caused Indonesia to remove the newcomers to an uninhabited location
further east along the coast. Nevertheless, conflicts continued between the
two villages.
When the militia started shooting livestock and burning
crops and houses and trees, instead of fleeing, the village warned the militia
that the resistance army, Falintil, was based in their ancestral lands, just a
few kilometres up the hill behind the village, and if they did not stop their
rampaging, Falintil would attack them.
Totally false, of course, as Falintil was in cantonment by
this stage; but it had the desired effect, and the village, who wanted to
retain the new found land, was saved from further destruction; however, some
were still left homeless, and others were forcibly taken across the border to
Atambua.
In another village consisting of six hamlets that was moved
down from the hills, four of the hamlets decided to return to their ancestral
lands; the other two decided to stay, having formed bonds such as marriage and
trade with neighbouring residents, while retaining their connection to the
village.
One man who had grown up on his parents’ plot in the hills and left to
join the resistance at the age of 15 years, returned to stake his claim to his
family’s land. It was rugged terrain with wild growth, but it was still fenced
off. He visited the neighbours, who remembered his parents planting trees and
building fences, and him living and playing there as a child, which would
support his claim to traditional title.
This former
resistance fighter also established a non government organisation to cultivate fields
that transmigrants had abandoned in 1999. Groups of five local members of
clandestine cells collectively farmed two hectares each.
A dam had been built at a nearby river to irrigate 680 hectares, but after one good season for the NGO, the dam collapsed and the fields dried out. The people working the transmigrant land went back to their family plots; only the original Bunak inhabitants remained. But they too had come to rely on the dam to irrigate their fields.
A dam had been built at a nearby river to irrigate 680 hectares, but after one good season for the NGO, the dam collapsed and the fields dried out. The people working the transmigrant land went back to their family plots; only the original Bunak inhabitants remained. But they too had come to rely on the dam to irrigate their fields.
The neighbouring
Mambai dam part of a stream with rocks and mud, and channel water into bamboo
pipes to their fields. The
Bunak did not, and their crops withered. They know there is a better system, so
don’t want to go back to the old ways. They want someone to fix the dam and the
irrigation channels that have silted up. The Bunak say that if there is
no water, the crops die, and they will die; others consider them lazy: according
to a Mambai man with irrigated fields, they have the knowledge to irrigate, but
would rather fuck and sleep than work.
An Australian construction company was contracted to pave the road
along the coast, and employed and trained local staff to work on rotation on the
project; but the people would only work near their homes. The company explained
that they would collect and return the workers to their homes each day, but this
missed the point that developing land by building a road gives people claim to
that land.
The company was further frustrated when it reached the border of the
Mambai village from which they had recruited, and the Tetun village which had
resisted the militia, as there was no way that still feuding groups were going
to let each other work on their land, so the company had to recruit and train a
new bunch, blowing out their budget and schedule.
The company was collecting sand and rocks from the river, a matter
which concerned a UN land and property lawyer, who requested the Environment
Protection Authority investigate. The EPA found that the practice had degraded
the environment, but the company argued that the work was done now, and could
not be undone. The subsequent wet season washed away the road where the rock
and sand had been removed, leaving the bridge crossing the river inaccessible
and the residents beyond it isolated.
The same river divides the majority of the Mambai and Bunak
populations who live in that area, although some from each group do live either
side of the river. When they fish in the sea, they will do so on their
respective Mambai (east) and Bunak (west) sides of the mouth of the river, no
matter which side they actually live on.
Spatial orientation has ritual significance: the Tetun bury their dead in an east-west orientation, with the headstone to the east so that when the soul rises it travels in that direction towards heaven. The orientation of east and west reflects a wider social behaviour, where male is represented by the right side, female by the left side. As one faces east, the wild sea of the southern coast to the right side takes the male name, tasi mane; the calm sea on the left and to the north is female, tasi feto. At a wedding, the wife’s family take the meat from the left side of the buffalo, husband’s family from the right. From the (female) interior of a house, as one faces the (male) outside, the left side of the house is female, the male side right. This is further represented by carved roof beam endings; the female ones inside, on which sacred goods are hung; the male beams outside, on which anything can be hung. In the sacred houses overseen by women, the sacred goods are kept on the left side of the roof; in male houses they are kept on the right side.
Spatial orientation has ritual significance: the Tetun bury their dead in an east-west orientation, with the headstone to the east so that when the soul rises it travels in that direction towards heaven. The orientation of east and west reflects a wider social behaviour, where male is represented by the right side, female by the left side. As one faces east, the wild sea of the southern coast to the right side takes the male name, tasi mane; the calm sea on the left and to the north is female, tasi feto. At a wedding, the wife’s family take the meat from the left side of the buffalo, husband’s family from the right. From the (female) interior of a house, as one faces the (male) outside, the left side of the house is female, the male side right. This is further represented by carved roof beam endings; the female ones inside, on which sacred goods are hung; the male beams outside, on which anything can be hung. In the sacred houses overseen by women, the sacred goods are kept on the left side of the roof; in male houses they are kept on the right side.
Secondary displacement became a problem with people being
repatriated from forced evacuation to find others whose houses had been
destroyed now occupying theirs. They still had the skills and materials to
build wooden and thatch houses, so set about doing this.
It takes 10 to 12 men five to
seven days to build a house of 6x5 meters, five metres high. The only tool is
katana (machete): straight one for the delicate work, intricate ornate
decoration, as well as the male and female beams described above, which the old
men tend to perform; and a large, curved katana that the younger men use for
the more arduous labour – especially roof assembly, which requires tremendous
dexterity and strength.
On a house of this size there are eight vertical beams of three metres in length, buried one metre in the ground, with three cross beams of six metres, and two of five metres, and a horizontal roof beam of two metres. All angled roof beams are seven metres. Twine is twisted around the beams and left to dry[ii].
On a house of this size there are eight vertical beams of three metres in length, buried one metre in the ground, with three cross beams of six metres, and two of five metres, and a horizontal roof beam of two metres. All angled roof beams are seven metres. Twine is twisted around the beams and left to dry[ii].
Local eucalypt or teak is used
for the beams; the gebang palm is folded and dried for two to four weeks to
thatch the roof. Coconut palm was used for roofing in some early rebuilding
after 1999 when surviving trees were scarce, but this does not keep out the
water.
The construction and architecture of traditional houses in the region are illustrated in the images below.
The construction and architecture of traditional houses in the region are illustrated in the images below.
Approximately half the population prepare their fields by burning, the
other half plough the soil. Those whose houses are away from the fields tend to
burn, while those who live in houses on their fields, quite sensibly, turn the
soil rather than burn the unwanted growth.
Where there is doubt over transmission of land, edlers’ memories of
who has worked the land are relied upon.
Should a dispute arise, it is settled in the customary way of the
contesting parties sitting down with the elders and negotiating. Animals are
not sacrificed unless some wrongdoing is deemed to have occurred, and the
wrongdoer is required to sacrifice a pig or a goat, or if the offence is great,
a buffalo.
A wet rice field in a Mambai area of 10 hectares supports 15
families, with enough rice to eat and leftover to sell. Trampling the fields
take 12 to 15 men a month, using 20 to 30 buffalo; while women collect
seedlings which they then plant in paddies.
In contrast to the above
illustration of conflict and claims to land, there was one instance of a group
of eight Tetun families each having a one hectare plot for wet rice cultivation
in the irrigated Mambai ricefields.
Plots are divided into heban,or padis, of 30 metres by 90 metres, and cultivation is done on a monthly rotation. There is not enough irrigated land to let any plots to lie fallow. They also grow other crops and have fruit trees and are largely self sufficient. They have chickens and goats, but not pigs as they eat the rice. They hire buffalo to plough the fields from someone in their own village in exchange for rice, or use a hand tractor. They eat the produce and don’t sell any. They share the rice with family members who help them, and they help with their corn and housebuilding when not busy in the ricefields.
Plots are divided into heban,or padis, of 30 metres by 90 metres, and cultivation is done on a monthly rotation. There is not enough irrigated land to let any plots to lie fallow. They also grow other crops and have fruit trees and are largely self sufficient. They have chickens and goats, but not pigs as they eat the rice. They hire buffalo to plough the fields from someone in their own village in exchange for rice, or use a hand tractor. They eat the produce and don’t sell any. They share the rice with family members who help them, and they help with their corn and housebuilding when not busy in the ricefields.
Men use a sabit ki’ik
(small sickle) to koa (cut, harvest) the rice and sabit bo’ot
(big sickle) to clear the weeds, and a hoe to build the heban walls (kabubu).
Rice is planted in a small field, then the women collect the seedlings for
planting in the broader area. The
families live for about a month in the huts in the fields when the most
intensive work is required.
People who need
wetland co-ordinate with people already living there to get unused land. There
is no financial transaction, but it is the responsibility of those who are
moving in to fence off land from marauding buffalo, pigs and goats. The people
moving in still say that they are from their ancestral homeland, and even say
that these plots are part of their village. This did not cause any conflict
with their Mambai neighbours. In Tetun areas, only if people cultivate land
does it become part of village; if people only have a house or a shop, they
don’t bring the name of their land with them.
Images illustrating the construction and architecture of houses in the area of the southern coast of central East Timor. (Click on the image to see an enlarged view).
Images illustrating the construction and architecture of houses in the area of the southern coast of central East Timor. (Click on the image to see an enlarged view).
Image 1 As an alternative to using traditional and locally available materials, people flatten out tin barrels to use in the construction of walls and fences. Copyright 2002 Matthew Libbis |
Image 4 The eastern doors are closed, with no access, and are only open to welcome new life (by marriage or childbirth) as is the custom amongst the Tetun (see Francillon). Copyright 2002 Matthew Libbis |
Image 5 Not all houses are constructed in the traditional style, with modern planing of wood, and internal supports. Copyright 2002 Matthew Libbis |
Image 6 Diagonal roof beams are carved to nestle thehorizontal beam, which are layered alternately above and below and bound with twisted twine to hold in place. Copyright 2002 Matthew Libbis |
[i]
Australian veterans wrote about this, eg: Callinan, B (1953) Independent Company: The
Australian Army in Portuguese Timor 1941–43, London: William Heinemann
[ii] Francillon describes in intricate detail the structural purpose of houses of the Tetun of Wehale in southern West Timor, which has many parallels with the Tetun of central southern East Timor. One was the eastern window being permanently covered, which was also observed in the hamlet beginning this piece, but a meaning for which was never ascertained. (Francillon, G (1967) Some matriarch aspects of the social structure of the southern Tetun of middle Timor, unpublished PhD thesis, Canberra:ANU)
*Matthew Libbis conducted anthropological fieldwork from 2000 to 2002 in East Timor, focusing on how the population was making the transition from occupation into independence. In addition to exploring socially sustaining institutions such as marriage, ritual and customs, his research was guided by prevailing issues that most concerned and affected the community, such as tensions between food production and participation in the formal economy, as well as more pressing issues of housing and reconciliation. He returned to East Timor from 2006 to 2008 following the Crisis that ripped the country apart to work in rebuilding the shattered civil society and governance structures. He has more recently been working in community resilience, social inclusion policy implementation, and humanitarian and disaster management, mitigation and recovery. He may be contacted at malibbis-at-gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment