JUDICIAL SYSTEM
MONITORING PROGRAMME PROGRAMA MONITORIZASAUN BA SISTEMA
JUDISIÁRIU
Press Release
11 February 2016
Dili District Court
Court suspends prison sentence and orders defendant to report periodically to the police and pay compensation to the victim
On 5 February
2016, the Dili District Court tried the defendant AC and sentenced him to 3
years in prison, suspended for 3 years. The court also applied an additional
order requiring the convicted person to report to the police once a month for
six months, and also ordered him to pay compensation of US$250 to the victim.
The public
prosecutor alleged that the defendant violated Article 154 of the Penal Code
for mistreatment of a spouse in conjunction with Article 35(a) of the Law
Against Domestic Violence.
“JSMP
supports the decision in this case because it is proportional
to the criminal offence committed by the defendant. In particular, the court
considered the importance of providing compensation to the victim to
acknowledge and provide restitution for the damage she suffered,” said
theExecutive Director of JSMP, Luis de Oliveira Sampaio.
JSMP believes
this case provides a good reference point for other courts to consider when
applying suspended prison sentences. JSMP believes this decision will deter
crimes characterized as domestic violence in the future. This decision
addresses JSMP’s concerns that perpetrators of domestic violence
generally receive suspended sentences without any additional obligations or
compensation. This decision shows that the courts are motivated to combat
violence against women in Timor-Leste.
In its decision
the court found that on an unspecified date in the month of April 2013 the
defendant was intoxicated when he choked the victim and threw her to the
ground.
In September
2013, the defendant and the victim argued because he suspected her of having a
relationship with another man. The defendant punched the victim twice on the
shoulder, kicked her in the back and choked her.
On 12 May 2014,
the defendant punched the victim once in the head and removed her from the
house because he was argry that she had sought medical treatment without taking
their sick child who also needed treatment. These acts caused the victim to
suffer swelling and pain to her shoulder, back and neck.
The court found
that the victim and the defendant have been living separately since this last
incident. These facts were based on the partial confession of the defendant,
the confirmation of the victim, witness testimony and the results of
cross-examination of the victim, the defendant and a witness.
Based on the
evidence established during the trial and all of the circumstances relating to
the aforementioned criminal acts, the court concluded the matter and convicted
the defendant.
Pursuant to
Article 92 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court provided its decision via
notification to the public prosecutor, public defender and the defendant
because they were absent on the scheduled date.
The case was
registered with the court as Case No.0009/14.DIMTN and was tried by a panel of
judges comprising Jumiaty Freitas, Albertinha Neves and Antonio Helder do
Carmo. The Public Prosecution Service was represented by Ivonia Maria Guterres
and the defendant was represented by Manuel Sarmento from the Office of the
Public Defender.
No comments:
Post a Comment